Outstanding
Report this review (spam, insults, etc.)brunorc • 2010-04-16 14:18:15
#12 this weekRetroflection
| 1 | 7:03 | 414 listens |
|
||
| 2 | 5:14 | 266 listens |
|
||
| 3 | 3:22 | 185 listens |
|
||
| 4 | 7:06 | 142 listens |
|
||
| 5 | 2:08 | 114 listens |
|
||
| 6 | 5:41 | 89 listens |
|
||
| 7 | 2:30 | 75 listens |
|
||
| 8 | 5:08 | 74 listens |
|
||
| 9 | 9:59 | 80 listens |
|
||
| 10 | 10:26 | 57 listens |
|
||
| 11 | 3:36 | 58 listens |
|
||
| 12 | 4:27 | 62 listens |
|
This is the first album we released and is part of a mass media communications experiment.
It was recorded over a period of 2 years and uses a kurzweil sampler, JX305, SP 12 drum, drumatic drum machine,sequential circuits pro 1 and 600, TB 626, 4 track recorder, 8 track otari, roland jx3p, kawai k1, tascam mixer and a few other machines as well as a busted plastic toy guitar and various sampled effects.
It was first played for a church group on easter sunday at a neighbors request: the silence was defeaning but many came to say 'thank you' as the others stared at us in what appeared to be sheer dismay. This is an example of a starting point for actually organising sound into somthing you may have heard or ignored. The sound quality is not hi fidelity as this is a definite low tek effort with a lot of energy going into the album. We went to a pro studio in Eugene, Oregon and had the album mixed on a 48 track board that was bought after the engineer did a tour with Rush.
Thanks for listening!
2 reviews
brunorc • 2010-04-16 14:18:15
asrilos • 2010-03-14 19:16:00
Normal version The "normal" version is compatible with most blogs and websites.
Report this review (spam, insults, etc.)
Report abuse or copyrighted content
Report abuse or copyrighted content
Please stay courteous and be sincere (for good and bad!). It can be an interesting read for others, but only if it is constructive and doesn't disparage the artist.
Please write about the music itself and don't be too hard on the sound quality of some demos.
.
A few ideas for your review :